INVISIGOD [Archive] - ForumsHQ

Post Reply
erek[NOT BANNED]
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 5:00 am

INVISIGOD [Archive] - ForumsHQ

Post by erek[NOT BANNED] »

and dont try and start with the psychobabble with me erek because no matter how you speak im not impressed.

i enjoy exercising the acquired knowledge from my education. it sometimes may be difficult to understand the comments or statements i make, but that does not constitute them as "psychobabble." just because someone isn't able to understand what i'm trying to say in it's entirety does not mean i'm trying to "impress" you or anybody. i like to try and use language correctly as i've been taught thus far. i'm trying to keep my writing abilities sharp to make it through this university.
AdmiralAcid
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2001 6:00 am

Re: INVISIGOD [Archive] - ForumsHQ

Post by AdmiralAcid »

C'mon erek.

When you utilize those language skills.

When you grace the members of FHQ with well worded text.

When you present a well formatted argument...

you IMPRESS YOURSELF! - as you should...

As far is it being psychobabble...

When you exercise any skill you naturally push yourself to the limits of your own ability. In the case of language this might result in others' interpretation as psychobabble.
erek[NOT BANNED]
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 5:00 am

Re: INVISIGOD [Archive] - ForumsHQ

Post by erek[NOT BANNED] »

no, i don't think that way

...i feel that my language is too mechanical and very boring. hopefully not as bad as lyki's (i don't mean to attack him, but who could bare to read his ideas?)
erek[NOT BANNED]
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 5:00 am

Re: INVISIGOD [Archive] - ForumsHQ

Post by erek[NOT BANNED] »

my feelings towards him belonging in this section are backed by,

1) he claims i'm bright.

2) later indirectly says i have a low iq, have lack of intelligence all stemming from his subjective beliefe that people who cuss and have a particular type of anger exhibit those features.

3) feeds the troll (me).

4) craps in my thread by only talking about, me instead of putting it back on topic

5) creates the only intentional personal insult in my thread.

classic moderation, just classic.
erek[NOT BANNED]
Posts: 0
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 5:00 am

Re: INVISIGOD [Archive] - ForumsHQ

Post by erek[NOT BANNED] »

addendum: this is an awesome moderator folks!

Well i'll just destroy your thread like you've done to so many others, makes you mad, huh?
AdmiralAcid
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2001 6:00 am

Re: INVISIGOD [Archive] - ForumsHQ

Post by AdmiralAcid »

duly noted... thread closed
Post Reply

Return to “Hall of Shame”