Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
-
Locke Cole
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2002 5:00 am
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Pity.
No kidding; it's just no fun if you can't experience his tantrum throwing first-hand.
No kidding; it's just no fun if you can't experience his tantrum throwing first-hand.
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
No kidding; it's just no fun if you can't experience his tantrum throwing first-hand.
Lol, oh how I've missed you locke.
Lol, oh how I've missed you locke.
-
erek[NOT BANNED]
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 5:00 am
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
ummm, SYS * has been in the game for a long time... far longer than just the possession through metropolis. also there were many people including yourself (locke cole) who were working on NT editors... the thing about having a life like you said brings up a valid point of why nobody else continued to work on their own except syntax. i guess i should apologize for collaborating with |RD| to change one byte in your mmedit2k alpha (that you were selling) to circumvent the serial check. honestly that one byte could not have been the downfall of mmedit2k... no, it had to be that you have a life.
addendum, as far as i know wcc required a special ReG#/Activation combination and it enabled the SYS *. after that metropolis seemingly stripped the syntax and shifted towards using a wccmmud.ini key to enable SYS *... i'm uncertain if the Beta NT ReG#/Activation code still works, nor do i care. all that knowledge (for me anyhow) was gained AFTER tinkering with IDA Pro on the functions individually...
addendum, as far as i know wcc required a special ReG#/Activation combination and it enabled the SYS *. after that metropolis seemingly stripped the syntax and shifted towards using a wccmmud.ini key to enable SYS *... i'm uncertain if the Beta NT ReG#/Activation code still works, nor do i care. all that knowledge (for me anyhow) was gained AFTER tinkering with IDA Pro on the functions individually...
-
Locke Cole
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2002 5:00 am
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
']honestly that one byte could not have been the downfall of mmedit2k... no, it had to be that you have a life.
Wow, that's like... so seven years ago (remembering it was called MMEDIT 2000, and was being developed in 1999).
Are you still going to be harping on this in 2016? I'd like to clear my calendar so I can make time for these nearly decade old issues you still have with me.
Wow, that's like... so seven years ago (remembering it was called MMEDIT 2000, and was being developed in 1999).
Are you still going to be harping on this in 2016? I'd like to clear my calendar so I can make time for these nearly decade old issues you still have with me.
-
erek[NOT BANNED]
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 5:00 am
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
i don't have any issues with you... do you have issues with me? it was only useful to mention mmedit2k to support my argument and you totally didn't even play into any kind of conversation... just total attack mode? okay. anyways, back to my point. "there were many people including yourself (locke cole) who were working on NT editors... the thing about having a life like you said brings up a valid point of why nobody else continued to work on their own..."
-
Locke Cole
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2002 5:00 am
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
You're trying to twist my "have a life" statement into an attack on syntax. Go away and practice your trollery elsewhere.
-
erek[NOT BANNED]
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 5:00 am
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
whoa, i didn't know it was like that between you two... excuse me. i guess that answers my question. you do have issues with me... that brings up some things i'd like to discuss.
i'm not trying to use the entertainment angle/card pretentiously, but it is how i feel. it is amusing when people (i.e. anyone who dislikes me or holds grudges) wishes bad things upon me. people who are angered at any positive aspects of my life and basically linger to pounce at any negative angle. for instance people who grasp at straws, like correcting my grammar even though the meaning of what i was saying was not lost due to the error. what's worse is the people who result to straight up personal attacks and are incapable of any argumentative behaviour. according to many it could be said that i'm a despicible human being (which is baseless.)
i'm not trying to use the entertainment angle/card pretentiously, but it is how i feel. it is amusing when people (i.e. anyone who dislikes me or holds grudges) wishes bad things upon me. people who are angered at any positive aspects of my life and basically linger to pounce at any negative angle. for instance people who grasp at straws, like correcting my grammar even though the meaning of what i was saying was not lost due to the error. what's worse is the people who result to straight up personal attacks and are incapable of any argumentative behaviour. according to many it could be said that i'm a despicible human being (which is baseless.)
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
I don't really know you. I do dislike you. I hope the bad thing that happens to you is that you forget your password again. You didn't capatalize new sentances, and I think you misspelled despicable.
This IS what you want, right?
This IS what you want, right?
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Erek, you did do alot for the mud community, anyone who has been around for awhile knows that!
But for the last what? 3 years you have done nothing but piss people off, why do you think you are not liked much around here anymore. Myself I have nothing against you, but I read your posts on here and I know why someone would come to not like you.
But for the last what? 3 years you have done nothing but piss people off, why do you think you are not liked much around here anymore. Myself I have nothing against you, but I read your posts on here and I know why someone would come to not like you.