stop being an idiot and read the faq:
http://forumshq.com/faq.php?
specifically: http://forumshq.com/faq.php?faq=vb_read_and_post#faq_vb_poll_explain
Erek's (real) Poll. [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Re: Erek's (real) Poll. [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Raiden and many many other people have reached an ultimate level of stupidity where they will agree with just about any and all derogatory or negative comments about me irregardless of how exagerrated they "potentially" may be.. laugh
-
muff
Re: Erek's (real) Poll. [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Hey, Im new with these forums ok? Don't call me an idiot. You are now, in public, reinforcing part of the reason for this thread. But I guess I asked for it, being stupid and all. Enjoy your REAL poll! :thumbu:
Re: Erek's (real) Poll. [Archive] - ForumsHQ
it pains me to have to say this but this did get put in the hall of flamers so its not gonna go entirely without flaming whether you are new or not.
-
muff
Re: Erek's (real) Poll. [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Its all good, just letting you know. I respect your opinion, didnt I ask for it?
-
muff
Re: Erek's (real) Poll. [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Irregardless isnt even a proper english word genius.
ir·re·gard·less
adv. Nonstandard
[Probably blend of irrespective, and regardless.]
Usage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.
ir·re·gard·less
adv. Nonstandard
[Probably blend of irrespective, and regardless.]
Usage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.
-
artic_3000
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:00 am
Re: Erek's (real) Poll. [Archive] - ForumsHQ
i think i speak of for everyone when i say "so what?"
-
artic_3000
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:00 am
Re: Erek's (real) Poll. [Archive] - ForumsHQ
im not really defending him
irregardless of what you or other people think
irregardless of what you or other people think