Thanx guys, Syntax sorry about my gurly hissy fit, I was rather a little stressed out, I had been working a little on my thesis prior to trying to get my bbs up, so my frame of mind probably wasn't at it's healthiest point.
Um yeah I guess for people that aren't really into the frame of mind as to how much shtuff happened about fifteen billion years ago, I wasn't either when I took this assignment either, but once I got into it it was actually interesting, now it's just boring as hell, and I really cannot find much in the way of new material. Partly the reason thesis's take so long, is there is just so much shit you can write about one subject before it get stagnant. But the base requirement for what ever bullshit reason is atleast 10 years or whatever base time over 10 years you put on your term papers.
The easiest way to put most of this into perspective is, When a planet goes nova one of 2 things are going to happen.
1: the planet is going collapse in on itself (most common) and make a black hole, now black holes themselves are intersting as because mass goes in and becomes super compressed. ie: Take the empire state building and compress it's mass to something the size of a golfball but still containing the weight of the empire state building. What goes into a black hole does come out, and there is usually a gaseous cloud near the mouth of a hole, in our case it's the crab nebula.
or
2: it blows out wards hurdling particles at warp speeds in a 360º radius (the big bang) and each item that was hurdled out was spining creating mini gravitational pulls to particles nearest them (the forming of galaxies). So one of those galaxies just happened to be able to sustain life, and there are probably a hell of alot more galaxies exactly like ours (personal thought here)
posted from Delete
id say hes interesting.. ask em how he jacks off next time you see em
Delete must be intersting to have the IQ of a a helium atom.
Dr. Stephen Hawking is one of the most brilliant minds of our time.
But like all the closed mind people out there that see someone in a wheelchair they usually think they are a retard or what not. Hawking has ALS, it has only disabled his body for the last 30 years, prior to that he was jsut as normal as anyone else.
So Delete grow the fuck up before you make a lame ass remarks.
Ok enough babbling for one day.
how was the universe created? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Re: how was the universe created? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Originally posted by Delete
id say hes interesting.. ask em how he jacks off next time you see em
I'm sure there's no shortage of nerdy chicks willing to make like pantharen's avatar:lol:
id say hes interesting.. ask em how he jacks off next time you see em
I'm sure there's no shortage of nerdy chicks willing to make like pantharen's avatar:lol:
Re: how was the universe created? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Originally posted by Helmut
I'm sure there's no shortage of nerdy chicks willing to make like pantharen's avatar:lol:
Dr. Hawking is married, So he probably has done somethin right.
Yeah even guys in "The Chair" need lovin too :)
I'm sure there's no shortage of nerdy chicks willing to make like pantharen's avatar:lol:
Dr. Hawking is married, So he probably has done somethin right.
Yeah even guys in "The Chair" need lovin too :)
Re: how was the universe created? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Originally posted by Degolas_Nightblade
As to whether or not the universe came from nothing, that would be impossible. If there was nothing, then there could be no thought or reality of any kind. If this was the case, nothing would have continued on without change, as there was nothing to change or shape it.
Hmm.
Of course, we must look at our own biases before objectively viewing any system. What truely is nothing? Isn't nothing truely something -- the absence of anything? An absence is still something. So again, we've shown that nothing truely is something.
But this shows a bigger problem -- we rationalize "physical" (let's not argue what is and isn't "physical") phenomena through language and science. Yet the systems of science and language were both man created. How can we truely believe that what we can express in either science or speech can be all inclusive of another, larger set? If A (the universe) encompasses B (us), which in turn encompasses C (our thought up processes and determinations), how can C fully describe B or A? A warped version of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal comes to mind...
Blah, I'm tired. Let me gather my thoughts and reply again later :)
As to whether or not the universe came from nothing, that would be impossible. If there was nothing, then there could be no thought or reality of any kind. If this was the case, nothing would have continued on without change, as there was nothing to change or shape it.
Hmm.
Of course, we must look at our own biases before objectively viewing any system. What truely is nothing? Isn't nothing truely something -- the absence of anything? An absence is still something. So again, we've shown that nothing truely is something.
But this shows a bigger problem -- we rationalize "physical" (let's not argue what is and isn't "physical") phenomena through language and science. Yet the systems of science and language were both man created. How can we truely believe that what we can express in either science or speech can be all inclusive of another, larger set? If A (the universe) encompasses B (us), which in turn encompasses C (our thought up processes and determinations), how can C fully describe B or A? A warped version of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal comes to mind...
Blah, I'm tired. Let me gather my thoughts and reply again later :)
Re: how was the universe created? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Well what IF, this is all just a fucked up dream, kindda like The Matrix, that we're not really alive but just a computer generated illusion by some Alien that has taken over the earth and is feeding off our bodies electrical energy?
And that the big bang theory didn't really happen but it's our subconcious going overtime telling us that something very wrong has happened and the big bang was a war between earth and this alien in which we lost and now we are being held captive in suspended animation in which we are not really awake nor are we really asleep.
hmmmm I wonder if I really did do too much acid in the past......
And that the big bang theory didn't really happen but it's our subconcious going overtime telling us that something very wrong has happened and the big bang was a war between earth and this alien in which we lost and now we are being held captive in suspended animation in which we are not really awake nor are we really asleep.
hmmmm I wonder if I really did do too much acid in the past......