Page 4 of 6
Re: Generation gap? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 8:43 pm
by Reckless
you are amoral Speed! :D
Re: Generation gap? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 8:45 pm
by Speed
I'd be a high mother fucker tho.
Re: Generation gap? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 8:47 pm
by zan
MMB should team together and create the worlds biggest bong, wed all be in the book of world records.
Re: Generation gap? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 8:48 pm
by MrBlack
The only laws I would deem immoral (remember morals are relative) would be the ones about killin ppl...but then that's also subjective. Was I gonna die if I didn't kill that fuk? If so, then it was alright...if it was unprovoked, then it wasn't...
Either way, it's morally right for me to grow some bud on my neighbors lot (because its not right to get caught and not be able to smoke it) and then harvest it later this year to smoke it in any manner I so desire.
Re: Generation gap? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 8:48 pm
by Speed
nah, hitting a bong bigger than a two or three footer isn't productive. I prefer one and a half foot glass pipes meself.
Re: Generation gap? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 8:54 pm
by MrBlack
Gallon jug gravity bongs :)
I still prefer the glass pipes too, just hits smoother :)
Used to have a homemade bong made out of a subway screw-top cup with a humidifier hose for inhaling through....once that hose started to resinate, it turned into a lung buster heh
Re: Generation gap? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 8:56 pm
by Reckless
Originally posted by MrBlack
The only laws I would deem immoral (remember morals are relative) would be the ones about killin ppl...but then that's also subjective. Was I gonna die if I didn't kill that fuk? If so, then it was alright...if it was unprovoked, then it wasn't...
Either way, it's morally right for me to grow some bud on my neighbors lot (because its not right to get caught and not be able to smoke it) and then harvest it later this year to smoke it in any manner I so desire.
morals are relative? It's immoral to kill someone unless your life is in danger. It's not immoral to kill someone when your life is in danger. There's no real middle ground in the moral side of it. The grey area comes from proving that you were in fear of your life.
This whole pot discussion is humorous. There is a reason why it's not legal. It's harmful to you. Spare me the flawed studies that say it increases penis size or brain size or eyesight or whatever you want to fabricate or invent. It dulls your mind after prolonged use. Under that logic, cigarettes should be illegal because no good comes from smoking.
Re: Generation gap? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 9:00 pm
by zan
its only immoral to kill because humans said it was. You dont see lions on the savana thinking they will let a gazelle live for the day because its immoral to kill.
Re: Generation gap? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 9:02 pm
by Reckless
There's a difference when you're talking about animals because they aren't able to cognitively think.
Re: Generation gap? [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2003 9:03 pm
by MrBlack
Heh, I've never seen a study that sayes pot is good for your eyesight (other than glaucoma) or helps brain/penis size heh...I know it has its detriments, and I don't care...I'm not a prolonged user, just a once a dayer hehe...I could care less if its harmful..it's good to me. Tobacco is evil, so is alcohol..those should be illegal, and in a drug class higher than pot on the schedule.
As for the morals are relative thing...they're relative to the person...some ppl would have a problem with killin in self defense...your garden variety soccer mom, for example, would most likely need to be commited after such an act...I however, wouldn't think twice about it, maybe later on, but whats done is done, can't change the past (as we've debated in the other thread ;))