Page 3 of 3

Re: more encumberance -- news to me

Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2003 7:26 pm
by Speed
Well, the #s on the screen relates directly to your resolution. You and I are using the same resolution Plat, but he may not be. Reck, theres 50 #'s there. You can't do 150-101, you have to do 150-100, because you have to count 0 as a digit if you are using regular subtraction.

Re: more encumberance -- news to me

Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2003 7:57 pm
by syntax53
it's 9000.

Re: more encumberance -- news to me

Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:05 pm
by Speed
Yea, I said that 18 posts ago, ray said it before. Reck didn't understand how we came to that conclusion, so I was trying to show him :)

Re: more encumberance -- news to me

Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2003 8:08 pm
by syntax53
Originally posted by Speed

Yea, I said that 18 posts ago, ray said it before. Reck didn't understand how we came to that conclusion, so I was trying to show him :)



nod i know, was just saying (in agreement)

Re: more encumberance -- news to me

Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2003 9:06 pm
by Helmut
Originally posted by Platinum

(and it's not a TUMA (for those that listen to rap))





you mean for those that have see Kindergarten Cop...

Re: more encumberance -- news to me

Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2003 9:07 pm
by Platinum
well yeah..but its in a verse that Ludacris does in a song thats rather new to the radio=P

Re: more encumberance -- news to me

Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2003 2:35 am
by Reckless
I said it before you did speed!!! I was merely wondering if they dealt with 0 in the equation. Not at the tens level, merely at the 0-1 level.

Re: more encumberance -- news to me

Posted: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:38 am
by syntax53
actually the "0" doesn't matter either. if it were 0 to 150, then that would be 151 numbers and would make it 9048 max enc. :)



-syn