more encumberance -- news to me
Re: more encumberance -- news to me
Well, the #s on the screen relates directly to your resolution. You and I are using the same resolution Plat, but he may not be. Reck, theres 50 #'s there. You can't do 150-101, you have to do 150-100, because you have to count 0 as a digit if you are using regular subtraction.
Re: more encumberance -- news to me
it's 9000.
Re: more encumberance -- news to me
Yea, I said that 18 posts ago, ray said it before. Reck didn't understand how we came to that conclusion, so I was trying to show him :)
Re: more encumberance -- news to me
Originally posted by Speed
Yea, I said that 18 posts ago, ray said it before. Reck didn't understand how we came to that conclusion, so I was trying to show him :)
nod i know, was just saying (in agreement)
Yea, I said that 18 posts ago, ray said it before. Reck didn't understand how we came to that conclusion, so I was trying to show him :)
nod i know, was just saying (in agreement)
Re: more encumberance -- news to me
Originally posted by Platinum
(and it's not a TUMA (for those that listen to rap))
you mean for those that have see Kindergarten Cop...
(and it's not a TUMA (for those that listen to rap))
you mean for those that have see Kindergarten Cop...
Re: more encumberance -- news to me
well yeah..but its in a verse that Ludacris does in a song thats rather new to the radio=P
-
Reckless
Re: more encumberance -- news to me
I said it before you did speed!!! I was merely wondering if they dealt with 0 in the equation. Not at the tens level, merely at the 0-1 level.
Re: more encumberance -- news to me
actually the "0" doesn't matter either. if it were 0 to 150, then that would be 151 numbers and would make it 9048 max enc. :)
-syn
-syn