Page 3 of 3
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:35 pm
by erek[NOT BANNED]
I don't really know you. I do dislike you. I hope the bad thing that happens to you is that you forget your password again. You didn't capatalize new sentances, and I think you misspelled despicable.
This IS what you want, right?
why not employ some intelligent use of sarcasm other than that impressive, predictable, garbage? :bowdown:
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:45 pm
by erek[NOT BANNED]
i don't talk to you because you say and post non-sense like this. take credit and lie about whatever you want to. i know what i've accomplished. the community knows what they've been able to accomplish because of what I have produced. i could give two shits what you think.
you "not giving two shits" is so obvious with the fact that responded and evidently were offended. i didn't lie about anything. where did i attempt to take credit for anything you or someone else did? you fixed a few problems here and there making the crack more complete. i specifically covered what i did; race, monster and item checks and a few other miscallaneous tweaks. we can owe many thanks to Hell69 (american NY cracker), |RD| (australian cracker), HotHotSun (aka sunrise or sunrise_ a russian female who created WhU/WgHack), coealexz, donut, SitOnMahFaceBaby (multiple muds on one wgserver), Locke Cole, erek (me), syntax and many honorable mentions.
Erek, you did do alot for the mud community, anyone who has been around for awhile knows that!
But for the last what? 3 years you have done nothing but piss people off, why do you think you are not liked much around here anymore. Myself I have nothing against you, but I read your posts on here and I know why someone would come to not like you.
at least your memory hasn't failed you. i appreciate your sincere and genuine approach to this subject without unnessecary flames, insults, or out right attacks on my self concept. i hope when people read over what you posted in this thread that they see a spark of reason.
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 3:04 pm
by Ghaleon
I just wanted to add that I have no problems with Erek. He can be annoying at times but all and all, I think he's aight.
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 1:04 am
by ari
']why not employ some intelligent use of sarcasm other than that impressive, predictable, garbage? :bowdown:
Because that garbage is what you come here for, it would seem.
As far as a "spark of reason", all I have to say is hypocrisy is an ugly thing.
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:06 am
by erek[NOT BANNED]
Because that garbage is what you come here for, it would seem.
As far as a "spark of reason", all I have to say is hypocrisy is an ugly thing.
you don't even make any sense. work on fully developing and backing up your arguments. i think i'm done responding to your comments, though.
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:52 am
by ari
That's fine, I'm not done with you.
Firstly, as far as backing up my arguments...I don't believe I actually need to list reasons I don't like you. The reason you get no respect is because you give no respect. How many posts have you started in the last month? There's 2 varieties: Help me and/or read my homework, or person X sucks for this reason. Yeah, we all love posting on the threads you start, but most of us prefer to tell you to shut the hell up, rather than agree with you or, I'll admit, even take your argument under consideration. I don't care what you think of Syntax, or Ray, or Isla, or myself for that matter. That dosen't mean keep your opinion to yourself, by all means you're entitled to post your views. But if you expect anyone to take you seriously, then you're definitely setting yourself up for dissapointment.
As far as your hipocrisy I spoke of, I'm sorry I didn't use quotes to point out the obvious topic I was speaking of, which is when you posted about "flames, insults, or out right attacks on my self concept." I don't think I need to expound about that, but if you like I'm sure someone else can step up to the plate for that softball down the middle.
I imagine you like to think of yourself as having superior intellect, and as such are required to point out perceived flaws with others. Eventually, you'll realize you're the only one still doing this on fhq, and when you go away, so will these asinine posts.
Now, please remember you're done responding to me, so take it like a man. ktnxbye.
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 1:30 pm
by erek[NOT BANNED]
i'm always going to laugh at the fact that syntax is willing to hold a grudge forever.
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 2:03 pm
by syntax53
']i'm always going to laugh at the fact that syntax is willing to hold a grudge forever.
this has nothing to do with a grudge. i don't like you and it's that simple. a grudge would be to not like you for a specific reason or incident. i don't like you for many reasons and many incidents.
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:45 pm
by erek[NOT BANNED]
i remember specifically one reason why you dislike me. you basically got upset because i was treating you no different than anyone else. as if you merited some special treatment. be my guest and distort or manipulate the whole situation to suit your argument against me. almost everybody is on your side irregardless of who's right or wrong anyhow. i guess my position and trying to defend it is basically futile. they will always see what you say as being more acceptable to society's social etiquette and norms and reasonable. oh well.
Re: Syntax [Archive] - ForumsHQ
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 12:20 pm
by DVS
']i guess my position and trying to defend it is basically futile.
I really dig that word futile...always have always will :ok: