Page 15 of 15

Re: Revoked

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2003 12:25 pm
by Mistress
Originally posted by Dark

I dont know how many of you have read what Locke has posted about the situation but what he says prob rings the truest.

If I was still a sysop, Id be very much afraid of the bs metro is pulling with Mouser since they can do it to ANYONE.



What are you going to do Mistress if Metro says, "well Lisa we heard from a few people that you did some editing of your board for a few hrs last night so we're revoking you. NO IFS,ANDS,OR BUTTS!"

You KNOW all about how Metro is when you got busted yourself and I think its time you get off your high horse and maybe, tell mouser what you had to go through with Metro or just be neutral at least. PLEASE stop acting like Blood Fetish who doesnt know his own smell even when hes standing next to a shitting horse.

Frost, well hell we all know about how much Frost is up metro's ass.. These forums are pretty much his life.





All Im saying is this topic outta unite ligit sysops because as metro says they are the real customers.



In all honesty, if I know I'm 100% in the right. I would not say a damn word to anyone. I would sue Metro for revoking my right to updates, sue them for lost payment from the BBS while it was down, they would be paying me a world of money. The lawsuit would speak for itself.



All Seeker has to do is have his lawyer go through discovery with Metro to find out exactly what they have on him. If his lawyer had done this, there would be no questions in his mind about what proof they have and he wouldn't be demanding it in forums.



Yeah, I went through hell with Metro. And I'm not taking anyones side on anything. If Seeker is in the right, by all means, take Metro's asses down. But from what I've personally (not only in forums but elsewhere) seen and read/heard/discussed with people, he's not innocent. Could I be mistaken? Could I have been lied to? Absolutely. But I highly doubt it.

Re: Revoked

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2003 7:45 pm
by Speed
Good god. Every flippin time I go away for a weekend, stuff like this happens. I will have to address all the finer points.



Originally posted by Mouse

Do you like work for metro speed, cause it seems you sure do get worked up with regards to a few things...grin Just curious of course.



I have a pet peeve with people attempting to make themselves look like something they are not. You aren't some hero, you aren't some bad ass, you are just some sysop who Metro believes distributed K. I am willing to bet that there is absolutely no corrolation between the two incidents.



Originally posted by Mouse

Day 6 Shannon sees her opportunity to strike at the heart of the sysop who made her look bad and get in trouble.



You need to change that to:

Day 6 Shannon notices that 1.11k is leaked to the public, specifically those that frequent MMB. Shannon browses MMB forums. Shannon sees a post by sysop that to any normal person who is not retarded BASICALLY (not in exact words) "I downloaded K this morning, I'll have it ready to distro in about 10 minutes."



You didn't EXACTLY say you were going to distribute K, but it can be assumed that is what you mean. I don't know where K came from, I'm not worried about where K came from. The *ONLY* thing that I want you to realize, is that this is *NOT* a personal attack against you. They are pissed their software got distributed. That's IT.



Originally posted by the same guy as before

Jeff even vocally told me shannon was wrong, want to hear the tapes?



Oh, so now you have tapes. You shoulda said that sooner. You should play them into a microphone, and tape them into a wav file and send them to us. Yes, we'd like to hear them. Oh, and tapes aren't admissible in court. Been there, done that. You have to notify the person that you are taping them. That's why at walmart and etc.. it says something about surveillance. If it didn't, those tapes from people stealing stuff would be irrelivant. Your lawyer can't do anything with the tapes except for listen to them for their own argument. She can REFER to the tapes, but that doesn't hold up well, so she probably wont.



Originally posted by Ray

i'd still :hump:



lol



Originally posted by Reckless

flaming someone for what they look like shows even more what a loser GM is. Not that I had any before, but if I had any respect for him, it'd certainly be gone now. Least she has the self-confidence to post her pic, let's see yours.



*nod*



Originally posted by Mouse

edit---I still think her photo is rude nasty and offensive, kermit



You are a picky bitch. Shut up. You know you don't find it offensive, you are just trying to piss people off.



Originally posted by Plat

we aren't all going to jump up with picket signs in front of Metro HQ.



*nod* - We don't jump to the side of whoever is fighting metro. We jump to the side of who we like better. It's much easier that way.



Originally posted by Mistress

Someone give him a piece so he'll be quiet!



I'll be quiet if you give me a piece. A nice packed bowl would be great right now. This thread is givin me a damn headache.



Originally posted by Plat

you still got that pic of my big nuts?



I hope not dude.

Re: Revoked

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2003 8:16 pm
by EvanElias
Originally posted by Speed

You didn't EXACTLY say you were going to distribute K, but it can be assumed that is what you mean. I don't know where K came from, I'm not worried about where K came from. The *ONLY* thing that I want you to realize, is that this is *NOT* a personal attack against you. They are pissed their software got distributed. That's IT.



Even if he did distribute K (and I have no idea if he did or didn't), it seems that Metro is going only on heresay and forum posts, without presenting concrete proof.



If they want solid proof about people distrib'ing stuff, they need stronger anti-piracy code. Seriously now, is that so difficult for them to do? They could easily make it so that the K executable was self-modifying so that when a sysop downloads an upgrade, the executable has an encrypted stamp of the sysop's reg info, spread out between random unused bytes in the binary so that it would take forever for crackers to solve. Then Metro could EASILY tell where a leak is, with proof instead of heresay.



But no, instead of taking a few hours to code better security measures, they prefer the avenue of revoking licenses based on heresay. That makes absolutely no sense to me.



Of course, a much more logical approach (IMHO) would be to drastically reduce the cost of their product, and/or sell an editor... they'd sell a lot more copies that way, and wouldn't need as many paid employees working on the game, since they wouldn't be wasting so many hours looking into edited games...

Re: Revoked

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2003 11:57 pm
by Speed
Even if he did distribute K (and I have no idea if he did or didn't), it seems that Metro is going only on heresay and forum posts, without presenting concrete proof.



*nod*, that's what I'm saying. I wasn't saying he did or didn't. I'm not saying metro is right or wrong. All I'm saying is that running around saying metro is after him because he pissed Shannon off is totally untrue. They are after him for supposedly distributing K and supposedly editing his board. That's it. He obviously does not have an edited board. He may or may not have distributed K, nobody but him knows. He says he didn't, and that's good enough for me.

Re: Revoked

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2003 12:05 am
by Demonic
Jesus F'in Christ this horse is dead already can we please stop beating it. Once your lawsuit is over and done with, let us know how it turned out. We really dont need an update every 5 minutes about you talking to someone who said something that someone else told thier cousins brothers uncles former college roommate. /sarcasm

Re: Revoked

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2003 12:19 am
by Gray Mouser
I really would like this thread to stop also plat, but i feel I must defend myself once again.

My lawyer specifically told me to tape any and all conversations. Why would she tell me if we wouldnt be able to use anything. I'm not saying it can or cant be used, but why would she tell me to do it if it holds no warrent what-so-ever?

As I said before, a friend of mine got temporary custody because he taped his x telling him he would never see his children again because of X and X and this and that. The judge listened to those tapes and based on those tapes granted him temp. custody. Liberty Mo.

I will not divulge any more info/personal emails/phone messages on the matter of metro disliking me. It seems to do nothing but provoke Reckless and Speed into bashing my intel about what and why this is or isnt an issue. My emails will show the court that they have a hard on for me, again lawyers advice to use said info.