ForumsHQ

You heard incorrectly. I chose to delete my chars due to conflicts with what I believe to be acceptable and unacceptable for ops to do and as one of those ops it was either accept the fact what I had seen done or not accept it and I chose not to accept it.This in no way had anything to do with you,I was not pleased you were back but it wasn't me you were conflicting with.I will not go into further detail as to why I deleted my chars though.

One may conclude that i was banned from forgottenages.. But truth be told i made a conscience decision to say the things i said the first time as Sparhawk. Knowing full well i would be banned i said the same sort of thing this time as Athalus. Even though the things i say are stupid and mindless. It's the best way i know to piss people off. And shit, it works and it makes me feel better. Someone once said that i was a Bi-Polar mudder. and i thought that a pretty good summation of me. Gunna take a break from mud for a while, might come back and own forgottenages again soon.



Im really not all that bad. I think at some point you could have attested to that?

its a shit board anyway

Any board is what you make or get out of it,there have been many shit boards.Most of which are no longer running,but as long as there are still people playing there it cant be that bad.

I guess theres only one thing i can say.. "Bring back Morbid". :(



Maybe someday.

[I]04:42pm Aurora gossips: I had a breakdown last night crying and shit, I cant handle having pvp





Umm, why would pvp make you have a breakdown and cry? It's a game, yo...



must be the flouride in the water.... :wallbang:

it's her bbs, she didn't want pvp, she doesn't need pvp

Doesn't necessarily condone crying about it, though. It's true that if a Sysop doesn't want pvp, they have a right not to have it. Hell, if a Sysop wants to randomly sys lightning people for no apparent reason, that's fine as well (as long as the users aren't paying for it..well, if people are still paying for mud, they do deserve to get fried I assume). But the fact of the matter is that the Sysop had PvP enabled with the rule that lawful's are exempt from PvP (which has never worked, at least from what I've seen), and then decided to take PvP away. That's just poor form and bad taste, in my opinion. But like Ray said, she can do whatever the hell she wants, it just puts a sour taste in some users mouths, and users are what a Sysop wants, right??



Yeah, I'm always that clean.

it just so happens that she was losing players because of pvp, so one could argue that she was keeping users by removing it ;)

Every board needs a Sparhawk..