Page 2 of 3
Re: Halflife 2
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 8:19 pm
by Kai Shadowbane
man look at those system reqs
| Recommended system requirements: |
| + Windows98/2000/Me/XP |
| + 2 GHz CPU |
| + 256 MB RAM |
| + DX9 compatible video card |
| + ~4 GB free hdd space |
did you even see the dx9 trailer for graphics?
and what's with the crappy ram req. you'd think they'd require more.
Re: Halflife 2
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 10:51 pm
by Speed
It does require more, but a Dx9 compatible video card (probably a decent 128mb card would be good) and 4 gigs of hard drive space kinda decreases the need for 512+ ram.
Re: Halflife 2
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 12:51 am
by Dark
Its been confirmed now
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=569&ncid=738&e=1&u=/nm/20031008/tc_nm/tech_vivendi_games_dc
Re: Halflife 2
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 7:56 am
by Speed
Uhm, it's been "confirmed" since the first post in this thread. That article says nothing that the other ones didn't.
Re: Halflife 2
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 10:23 am
by Necrosaro420
You all have link for beta of it?
Re: Halflife 2
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 12:16 pm
by Raybdbomb
tsk tsk necro, tsk tsk
Re: Halflife 2
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:23 pm
by Speed
Isn't beta the public beta release? Not necessarily "public" - but still not illegal to distribute.
Re: Halflife 2
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:31 pm
by Raybdbomb
nope
it was leaked which makes it illegal to own, want to own, request to own, or even look at :P
Re: Halflife 2
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 2:21 pm
by Speed
Ah. Well, that's stupid.
Re: Halflife 2
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 12:38 am
by apathy
Isn't beta the public beta release? Not necessarily "public" - but still not illegal to distribute.
Would that make a commerical copy able to be distributed legally by anyone? :) It's their property...
Now, from a coder standpoint, what exactly was in the source? Part of the physics engine? Sprite handling? Texture/Map handling? The multiplayer engine? Someone give me details...I'm too lazy to dig :)