Page 2 of 2

Re: That decompiled version of WG

Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2002 1:43 am
by Brunt
Yup...I am on cable, and can leave my laptop on 24/7...I guess if its to much trouble...maybe we can work something else out.

Re: That decompiled version of WG

Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2002 1:51 am
by drcorey
Originally posted by Brunt

Yup...I am on cable, and can leave my laptop on 24/7...I guess if its to much trouble...maybe we can work something else out.



err, it's also up on my ftp, most of it, plus more.

ftp://tsgc.dyndns.org

Re: That decompiled version of WG

Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2002 5:59 am
by Brunt
Originally posted by drcorey





err, it's also up on my ftp, most of it, plus more.

ftp://tsgc.dyndns.org



Says I dont have access..are there certain times its not up?

Thanks!

Re: That decompiled version of WG

Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2002 12:56 pm
by drcorey
Originally posted by Brunt





Says I dont have access..are there certain times its not up?

Thanks!



I saw that, I think I fixed it now.

I hopes.

Re: That decompiled version of WG

Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2002 7:03 pm
by Brunt
hmm...can you just give me the ip?

AIM Hindra

Re: That decompiled version of WG

Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2002 7:14 pm
by LordSoth
BTW drcory, I just recently got set up with that package of files recompiled for 486... the system does seem to run a little faster now. Just too damn bad you can't compile it for even faster processors.

Re: That decompiled version of WG

Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2002 9:37 pm
by Brunt
Well...I was at work, and got online..and I could connect to the ftp, so when I got off, I rushed home....after checking to make sure it was still up..I get home, and cant connect...grr...well, I plugged my laptop straight into the cable modem, instead of going through the router/switch...and there ya go...downloading away..

Re: That decompiled version of WG

Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2002 3:53 pm
by LordSoth
Originally posted by LordSoth

BTW drcory, I just recently got set up with that package of files recompiled for 486... the system does seem to run a little faster now. Just too damn bad you can't compile it for even faster processors.



Correction... I'd say it runs quite a bit better. Before I switched to the 486 compiled files at one point I'd made a macro that issued a bunch of commands really quick to see what would happen with the system load (It did a bunch of commands like (top 10, /rec, /#, who, sys list limited, etc). Anyhow it would drive the system load up to 6-8% or more. Now that I've updated to the 486 compiled files I can't seem to get it to budge past 2%. :)