That decompiled version of WG
Re: That decompiled version of WG
Yup...I am on cable, and can leave my laptop on 24/7...I guess if its to much trouble...maybe we can work something else out.
Re: That decompiled version of WG
Originally posted by Brunt
Yup...I am on cable, and can leave my laptop on 24/7...I guess if its to much trouble...maybe we can work something else out.
err, it's also up on my ftp, most of it, plus more.
ftp://tsgc.dyndns.org
Yup...I am on cable, and can leave my laptop on 24/7...I guess if its to much trouble...maybe we can work something else out.
err, it's also up on my ftp, most of it, plus more.
ftp://tsgc.dyndns.org
Re: That decompiled version of WG
Originally posted by drcorey
err, it's also up on my ftp, most of it, plus more.
ftp://tsgc.dyndns.org
Says I dont have access..are there certain times its not up?
Thanks!
err, it's also up on my ftp, most of it, plus more.
ftp://tsgc.dyndns.org
Says I dont have access..are there certain times its not up?
Thanks!
Re: That decompiled version of WG
Originally posted by Brunt
Says I dont have access..are there certain times its not up?
Thanks!
I saw that, I think I fixed it now.
I hopes.
Says I dont have access..are there certain times its not up?
Thanks!
I saw that, I think I fixed it now.
I hopes.
Re: That decompiled version of WG
hmm...can you just give me the ip?
AIM Hindra
AIM Hindra
Re: That decompiled version of WG
BTW drcory, I just recently got set up with that package of files recompiled for 486... the system does seem to run a little faster now. Just too damn bad you can't compile it for even faster processors.
Re: That decompiled version of WG
Well...I was at work, and got online..and I could connect to the ftp, so when I got off, I rushed home....after checking to make sure it was still up..I get home, and cant connect...grr...well, I plugged my laptop straight into the cable modem, instead of going through the router/switch...and there ya go...downloading away..
Re: That decompiled version of WG
Originally posted by LordSoth
BTW drcory, I just recently got set up with that package of files recompiled for 486... the system does seem to run a little faster now. Just too damn bad you can't compile it for even faster processors.
Correction... I'd say it runs quite a bit better. Before I switched to the 486 compiled files at one point I'd made a macro that issued a bunch of commands really quick to see what would happen with the system load (It did a bunch of commands like (top 10, /rec, /#, who, sys list limited, etc). Anyhow it would drive the system load up to 6-8% or more. Now that I've updated to the 486 compiled files I can't seem to get it to budge past 2%. :)
BTW drcory, I just recently got set up with that package of files recompiled for 486... the system does seem to run a little faster now. Just too damn bad you can't compile it for even faster processors.
Correction... I'd say it runs quite a bit better. Before I switched to the 486 compiled files at one point I'd made a macro that issued a bunch of commands really quick to see what would happen with the system load (It did a bunch of commands like (top 10, /rec, /#, who, sys list limited, etc). Anyhow it would drive the system load up to 6-8% or more. Now that I've updated to the 486 compiled files I can't seem to get it to budge past 2%. :)